Successes for American's United for Life UAL- Pro-Life

Dear Reader,

There are some exciting new developments on the movement for Americans United for Life (UAL). I am thrilled to show you the very recent progress that has occurred. I can enthusiastically report that over 64 recent anti-abortion new laws have passed. This has resulted from the republican take over of half of the nation's state houses. Check out the article below:

In this issue of Bench Briefs: The New York Times reports on the pro-life victories that AUL is having nationwide advancing pro-life legislation state by state, and AUL marks another pro-life win in a key Ohio case.

The New York Times Says AUL Part of
"The Reincarnation of Pro-life"

Photo at above left by Geoff Livingston

“The way we’re gathering momentum is just amazing,” says Dr. Charmaine Yoest, Americans United for Life President and CEO to the New York Times.

The newspaper of record, the New York Times, over the holiday weekend reported groundbreaking pro-life victories in its weekly magazine. Front and center was AUL.

“Ever since Republicans took control of half the country’s statehouses this year, the anti-abortion movement has won one victory after another. At least 64 new anti-abortion laws have passed, with more than 30 of them in April alone. The campaign is the largest in history and also the most creative. Virginia started regulating abortion clinics as if they were hospitals. Utah, Nebraska and several other states have stopped private health insurers from covering abortions, with rare exceptions. South Dakota will soon tell women that before they go to an abortion clinic, they must first visit a crisis pregnancy center whose mission is to talk them out of it,” wrote reporter Emily Bazelon.

After talking with Dr. Yoest about AUL’s role in developing and promoting legislation that can strategically – and constitutionally – roll back Roe v. Wade and pass life-protecting measures, the reporter called the advances “incrementalism on steroids.” Click here to read the entire article.

AUL’s premier legal team reports that in 2011, AUL model language has already been adopted or enacted (in whole or in part) in 9 states and that AUL has actively consulted in 37 states. And more than 1,500 copies of AUL’s model legislation, the blueprint for life-affirming legislation, has been distributed in 46 states, the District of Columbia, and overseas.

As legislative session begin to wrap up, AUL continued to move the ball forward for life last week.

At left: former Nebraska Governor Kay Orr.

In Nebraska, the AUL-drafted parental consent bill LB 690 was passed and signed into law less than two hours later by Governor Dave Heineman. The bill was championed by former Nebraska Gov. Kay Orr whose daughter Suzanne is AUL’s state coordinator. To read a profile of Gov. Orr and her family’s pro-life involvement with AUL, click here.

In Alabama, the state senate took up, SB202. Sen. Greg Reed introduced the bill, based on AUL model legislation, which would prohibit insurance plans participating in the state exchange created in President Obama’s health care law from covering abortions. If passed by the house, Alabama will join 12 other states that have passed similar opt-out measures, including: Arizona, Idaho, Indiana, Kansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Nebraska, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Utah and Virginia. To read an Associated Press story on events in Alabama, click here.

And in New Hampshire, Representative Kathy Souza introduced and spearheaded HB 329 to provide long-overdue protections for young girls who need parental guidance when facing pressure to have an abortion. First passed in the House, the bill cleared the Senate with a veto-proof majority. It now goes to the Governor for consideration. If it becomes law, it will require parental notification prior to a young, underage girl obtaining an abortion. This would reinstate a law repealed in 2007.

Dear Reader,

Thank you for your interest in these issues. Please post me a comment when you get a

minute.

Best Regards,

Dave Udall

Some Points Scored for Obama: Bin Laden demise

Dear Reader,

I just wanted to make one comment in regards to the recent demise of Bin Laden, the extremely cruel 2001 master mind terrorist. I have to say that I was very pleased with this event which was driven by the Obama administration. To Obama's credit, he tenaciously followed up on what Bush started, and he and his people stayed with the program that resulted in taking Bin Laden down. I also wanted to say that I was very impressed with what the brave men of the Navy Seals accomplished. It is good to still see that nothing stops the Americans when they set their minds to something that needs to be done.

Sincerely,


Dave Udall

Gays in America and their filthy, rotten, perverse plans to capture our precious children into homosexuality and it's attendent vices.

Dear readers:

I wanted to post up some of the latest horrible shenanigans and horrid plans of some of the people in the gay community inside this great country, even the great USA. My good friends, the Grahams, work pro-actively to expose more fully the gay movement and to counter act their wicked plans with wholesome/good plans to teach our children in America to choose the right and to be virtuous and morally good. Please scroll down to the bottom. Here is their latest newsletter from the Standard of Liberty entitled:

"Recruiting children? You bet we are."- Gay Magazine Admits Radical Agenda
May 24, 2011

Many gays do not like it, but an online magazine, QUEERTY.com has published an article by editor Daniel Villarreal entitled, "Can We Please Just Start Admitting that We Do Actually Want to Indoctrinate Kids?" The author proudly confesses that one of the gay agenda's main goals is to indoctrinate school children into accepting "queer sexuality as normal."

The article states: "We want educators to teach future generations of children to accept queer sexuality. In fact, our very future depends on it."

And "Why would we push anti-bullying programs or social studies classes that teach kids about the historical contributions of famous queers unless we wanted to deliberately educate children to accept queer sexuality as normal?"

And "I and a lot of other people want to indoctrinate, recruit, teach, and expose children to queer sexuality AND THERE'S NOTHING WRONG WITH THAT."

And "I for one certainly want tons of school children to learn that it's OK to be gay, that people of the same sex should be allowed to legally marry each other, and that anyone can kiss a person of the same sex without feeling like a freak."

And "I would very much like for many of these young boys to grow up and . . ." I want lots of young ladies to develop into young women who voraciously . . . "

And "not educating our kids about queer issues makes them ignorant, hateful little morons."

The article urged fellow gays to face this reality, be proud of it, and combat resistence from those promoting traditional moral values by creating "ads - with tons of verifiable supporting evidence-that just plainly state that denying marriage equality ruins people's lives."

As we at SoL have said before, this fight is not about marriage. The institution of marriage is merely being exploited and redefined to promote the acceptance of risky, perverse, unlimited sexuality . . . yes, to kids.

Those promoting this agenda are making tremendous progress and they won't stop. As the author of the article obviously knows, our society is at war for the hearts of its children, a war between two diametrically opposed world views: one hedonistic, the other God-centered. We quote: "Remember, Prop 8 passed along age lines with the very old voting largely in favor of it. The younger generation doesn't fear homosexuality as much because they're exposed to fags on TV, online, and at school."

Read the entire article from Queerty magazine. WARNING: extremely vulgar sexual language.

We congratulate our readers who are striving to counteract the gay agenda in their families, churches, and communities. For help, see the entire text of Me Tarzan, You Jane, a nondenominational book for the youngest children here or find the book available now at BYU Bookstore and tidalwavebooks.com. Also Chased by an Elephant (for LDS families) or Wild Elephant (for all other Christian families), The Gospel Truth About Today's Stampeding Sexuality for families with older children.

-Standard of liberty

**** Dear blog reader:

Note: It's high time that all social conservatives need to get involved in one good cause or another to do something valliant like the Grahams are doing with their Standard of Liberty organization. We can no longer stand idly by on the side lines anymore if we are in fact standing idly by. We must step it up and formulate a plan to help protect cherished family values in our communities in the great USA. We need to be willing to step it up by stepping out of our comfort zones if necessary to boldly speak up against the proactive gays or choose some other important social issue that strikes a strong chord inside your heart. We applaud the Graham family for stepping it up!

Most sincerely,


Dave Udall

Obama and his comments on Israel and the Palestine state

WASHINGTON—U.S. President Barack Obama, seeking to place the U.S. ahead of the political tumult sweeping the Middle East, promised support and economic assistance for democratic reformers and for the first time called for the creation of a Palestinian state based on Israel's pre-1967 borders.

Dear readers,

This is my take on Obama's recent statements on the mid-east conflict:

Are you kidding me Obama! You have the audacity to tell Israel to roll back their borders to pre-1967. The Israeli people have spent blood, sweat and tears to obtain, defend and maintain every square inch of the property they now hold. Obama ought to be reminded that it was Egypt and Syria that provoked the war in 1967 against Israel. Please go to this link to review some history on the war:

http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/History/67_War.html

If the Israeli army and air force would not have been proactive to quickly engage themselves against Egypt and Syria, they probably would have been decimated! The war plans of Egypt and Syria definitely back fired against them. Once again, they (Israel/Syria), provoked the war and thus in turn deserved to lose the 1967 war against Israel, including the ground they lost.

The aftermath are just the fortunes of war. NOTE: Obama and his staff need to go back to the drawing board and Obama ought to retract his recent ridiculous statements on what Israel should do!

Sincerely,

Dave Udall

A few choice politcal jokes from comedians

A few choice politcal jokes from comedians

Dear Reader,

Here are a few political jokes just to get us all laughing:

The Honeymoon is over.

You know the honeymoon is over when the comedians start.

The liberals are asking us to give Obama time.

We agree...and think 25 to life would be appropriate.

--Jay Leno

America needs Obama-care like

Nancy Pelosi needs a Halloween mask.

--Jay Leno

Q: Have you heard about McDonald's' THIRD PRIZE (TIE)

new Obama Value Meal?

A: Order anything you like

and the guy behind you has to pay for it.

--Conan O'Brien

Q: What does Barack Obama

call lunch with a convicted felon?

A: A fund raiser.

--Jay Leno

Q: What's the difference between FIRST PRIZE

Obama's cabinet and a penitentiary?

A: One is filled with

tax evaders, blackmailers,

and threats to society.

The other is for housing prisoners.

--David Letterman

Q: If Nancy Pelosi and Obama were on a boat

in the middle of the ocean and it started to sink,

who would be saved?

A: America !

--Jimmy Fallon

Q: What's the difference between SECOND PRIZE

Obama and his dog, Bo?

A: Bo has papers.

--Jimmy Kimmel

Q: What was the most positive result of THIRD PRIZE (TIE)

the "Cash for Clunkers" program?

A: It took 95% of the

Obama bumper stickers off the road.

--David Letterman

I hope you enjoyed these jokes. Have a great week!!

Best Regards,


Dave Udall

ACLU: The Super Bullies of Christianity in the USA

ACLU: The Super Bullies of Christianity in the USA

ACLU Threatens N.J. High School With Legal Action Over Graduation at Christian-Owned Site

By Cristina Corbin

Published May 17, 2011

| FoxNews.com

• Print
• Email
• Share
• Comments (2766)
• 
  
• 
  

Dear Blogger reader:

I don't know about you but I am sick of seeing the ACLU bully public schools and various organizations across the USA, as they are doing in this case? I hope that there are some political conservatives out there who have deep pockets that would take the ACLU on in this case. It is high time that the ACLU be confronted head on for working so hard to ruin Christian social traditions in this great country. If the Christian symbols offend people out there, they do not have to attend this function. The students could request to have their diploma's mailed to them, if they are so offended that they do not want to attend. It's high time that Americans really rally for having the mentioning of God and Christ included again their public schools!! To go a step farther, I am sure this is not politically correct but I strongly feel that Christ is the God of this free land, the United States of America!!

Most Sincerely,

Dave Udall

For generations, graduates of Neptune High School have walked down the aisle of the Great Auditorium in Ocean Grove, N.J., where the impressive 6,500-seat venue dominates the landscape of one of the area's most historic beach towns.

A New Jersey high school with a 70-year tradition of hosting graduation ceremonies in a historic auditorium is standing firm against legal threats from the American Civil Liberties Union, which claims the event violates the separation of church and state because of the Christian-owned site's religious displays.

For generations, graduates of Neptune High School have walked down the aisle of the Great Auditorium in Ocean Grove, where the impressive 6,500-seat venue dominates the landscape of one of the area’s most historic beach towns. Built in 1894, the auditorium is owned and operated by the Ocean Grove Camp Meeting Association, a Methodist group that owns not just the building, but all of the land beneath every home and structure in town.

The ACLU of New Jersey threatened legal action against the Neptune school district after an attendee at last year’s graduation ceremony took offense to the building’s religious symbols and Christian-based references -- among them a 20-foot white cross above the auditorium’s entrance. The ACLU asked the school to remove or cover up the cross and three other religious signs, arguing their visibility during a public school event is a First Amendment violation.

School officials responded by agreeing to change the graduation program to remove the student-led invocation and two hymns -- one titled “Onward Christian Soldiers” -- to rid the ceremony of any religious references.

“The program was not of a religious nature -- it was more tradition than anything else,” said Neptune Public Schools Superintendent David Mooij. “But we decided we would change the program and delete the things this individual found offensive.”

Removing or covering up the cross was another matter. The Camp Association said it could not cover the cross, said to have been a gift from movie director Woody Allen, who used the auditorium during shooting for the 1980 film "Stardust Memories." Nor would they cover up the two illuminated indoor signs – “Holiest to the Lord” and “So Be Ye Holy” – which are said to be the oldest operating electric signs in America.

“The Ocean Grove Camp Meeting Association is a Christian ministry, and we can’t change who we are,” said Scott Hoffman, the group’s chief operating officer. “We want this tradition to keep going as badly as anyone, but not at the expense of who we are.”

Mooij said the ACLU then requested that the school change its venue for the June 17 graduation – a move he said isn’t feasible. “We already printed 3,000 tickets, and there’s no comparable size venue anywhere around us.”

Mooij said the school board received a letter on Thursday from the ACLU saying they would “likely have to take legal recourse” if their demands to cover the cross and signs were not met.

An ACLU spokeswoman would not comment on what, if any, legal action is pending, saying only that the organization is working to resolve the matter through negotiations with the school.

The Great Auditorium, a nationally recognized landmark, is steeped in history. The building has hosted Ulysses S. Grant and six other U.S. presidents, as well as 27 of New Jersey’s governors. Mark Twain was a member of the auditorium’s board of directors, and religious leaders like the Rev. Billy Graham have spoken there.

The auditorium also functions as a concert venue for many secular events and has hosted acts as varied as the Beach Boys, Frank Sinatra Jr., and Peter, Paul and Mary.

As for now, Mooij said the school has every intention of sticking with its graduation plans.

“There’s a lot of tradition in this community about using this building,” he said. “We’re hoping that it could be resolved through negotiations,” he said, “But we aren’t there yet.”

Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/us/2011/05/17/aclu-threatens-legal-action-nj-high-school-amendment-dispute/#ixzz1MeIbXqzK

Dear Blogger reader:

I don't know about you but I am sick of seeing the ACLU bully schools and various organizations across the USA, as they are doing in this case? I hope that there are some political conservatives out there who have deep pockets that would take the ACLU on in this case. It is high time that the ACLU be confronted head on for working so hard to ruin Christian social traditions in this great country. If the Christian symbols offend people out there, they do not have to attend this function. The students could request to have their diploma's mailed to them, if they are so offended that they do not want to attend. It's high time that Americans really rally for having the mentioning of God and Christ included again their public schools!! To go a step farther, I am sure this is not politically correct but I strongly feel that Christ is the God of this free land, the United States of America.

Most Sincerely,

Dave Udall

Obama the Presidential Divider:

Conservative Cause Blog Article and commentary

Obama the Presidential Divider:

Before comment: Didn't Obama run on a campaign to cut the divisions between the two major political parties? Did he not pledge to the American people that he would be more of a uniter and not a divider? It is my opinion that he has instead become one of the strongest polarizing forces as a president that we have ever seen in our nation's history.

Here is an except from a recent Wall Street Journal Article on Obama's recent toxic speech on the deficit, debt and the new federal taxes he wants to implement:


“Did someone move the 2012 election to June 1? We ask because President Obama's extraordinary response to Paul Ryan's budget yesterday—with its blistering partisanship and multiple distortions—was the kind Presidents usually outsource to some junior lieutenant. Mr. Obama's fundamentally political document would have been unusual even for a Vice President in the fervor of a campaign. Joseph Rago and Steve Moore on who will pay more under the White House's planned tax increases. The immediate political goal was to inoculate the White House from criticism that it is not serious about the fiscal crisis, after ignoring its own deficit commission last year and tossing off a $3.73 trillion budget in February that increased spending amid a record deficit of $1.65 trillion. Mr. Obama was chased to George Washington University yesterday because Mr. Ryan and the Republicans outflanked him on fiscal discipline and are now setting the national political agenda. Mr. Obama did not deign to propose an alternative to rival Mr. Ryan's plan, even as he categorically rejected all its reform ideas, repeatedly vilifying them as essentially un-American. "Their vision is less about reducing the deficit than it is about changing the basic social compact in America," he said, supposedly pitting "children with autism or Down's syndrome" against "every millionaire and billionaire in our society." The President was not attempting to join the debate Mr. Ryan has started, but to close it off just as it begins and banish House GOP ideas to political Siberia. Mr. Obama then packaged his poison in the rhetoric of bipartisanship—which "starts," he said, "by being honest about what's causing our deficit." The speech he chose to deliver was dishonest even by modern political standards."

An after comment from Dave Udall: Did Obama give us his well thought out constructive plan to get the national budget balanced or did he just pounce on Congressman's Ryan and criticized it as a bad plan? Where is Obama's leadership to make a real CHANGE to get the USA back on a strong financial foundation? I thought he was supposed to be the great CHANGE president. Yes, he is the CHANGE president but his budget proposals and our national spending patterns are outrageously out of control!

Planned Parenthood facilitates federally funded abortions

March 30th, 2011

Dear blog reader,

The irresponsible liberals, for the sanctity and protection of human life, in the senate worked hard to make sure that Planned Parenthood got fully funded again. This action is repulsive, especially in wake of the recent scandals which have shown the very deceptive nature of the people who direct and operate this sleazy organization that promotes and facilitates the terrible practice of abortion.

Again, a valiant effort was made by the house led by Mike Pence (R-Indiana), to defund this organization but it died in the US senate. But there is still hope. Please check out the article below that shows how the AUL, Americans United for Life, are still working hard to get the American tax payer out of the abortion business. We solute their valiant efforts to remedy this improper use of the hard earned money taken from the American tax payer for something the vast majority do not support (see below)!!! You might want to consider a donation to the UAL. Look them up on Google.

Please check out the details below for more of the story:

“This week, the U.S. Senate rejected the Continuing Resolution passed by the House, which cut the one-third of a billion dollars the federal government currently gives to the nation’s largest abortion provider: Planned Parenthood. The majority of the Senate is poised to add abortion dollars back to its version of the budget even after the House voted to cut such funding. While the matter failed in the Senate, the effort to cut funding to Planned Parenthood passed with bipartisan support in the House, through an amendment from Representative Mike Pence (R-IN) to the Fiscal Year 2011 Budget, to H.R. 1, the long-term Continuing Resolution.

But that is not the end of the matter.

As legislators wrestle with the fact that more than 70 percent of Americans – pro-life and pro-choice – do not want their tax dollars to pay for abortions, many are beginning to ask a key question: With more than $360 million tax dollars to spend, what does the abortion industry really do with the money?

To find out more at the state level, AUL,( Americans United for Life ), has produced and distributed Joint Resolutions calling for the investigation and defunding of Planned Parenthood and other abortion providers on a state and local level. And AUL has drafted model legislation that would require clinics to be regulated for the safety of the women who go there for services.

At the federal level, AUL has called on Congress to freeze Planned Parenthood’s currently-allocated federal funding and hold hearings to investigate Planned Parenthood and other abortion providers’ consistent disregard for women and girls’ health and safety and for the law.

AUL President and CEO Dr. Charmaine Yoest noted, “Planned Parenthood’s legacy is a sordid one of ruined lives and deceptive, politically-motivated actions. AUL is working hard to ensure Americans’ tax dollars do not line the pockets of an organization which has a pattern and practice of failing to safeguard women’s rights and health.”

Getting the American taxpayer out of the abortion business continues to be an AUL push as Congress looks for ways to cut the size and scope of government. To sign a letter to your member of Congress calling for an end to the federal funding of the Nation’s largest abortion provider, click here.

But Planned Parenthood and the abortion lobby will not go quietly.”

Thanks for your interest in reading this article!

Dave Udall

Obama's Admnistration's Insanely out of Control Budget Deficits

Now Check this out:

From the Grassfire Nation Update:




In February the Barack Obama-led federal government posted
the largest monthly deficit in U.S. history -- an amount
larger than the deficit for the entire year of 2007:

          Federal budget deficit, February 2011: $223 Billion

          Federal budget deficit, all of 2007: $160.7 Billion

Barack Obama's government is running up larger deficits in
a MONTH than the government posted in a YEAR just a few years
ago.

Meanwhile in Congress, according to the Washington Times, "a
top Senate Democrat said his party can accept no more than $6
billion in domestic cuts."

$6 BILLION!!!!! What about the $223 BILLION deficit from
February alone!

+ + Showdown Coming by March 18

A crucial showdown will take place by March 18 in Congress
over the Continuing Resolution (CR). Democrats are threatening
to reject the House G.O.P. plan to cut $57 billion in spending
for the rest of this fiscal year. They say those cuts are too
much.

Meanwhile, union agitators, the White House and leftist leaders
like Michael Moore are creating a revolt IN FAVOR OF MORE
GOVERNMENT AND MORE SPENDING!

WE ARE ABOUT TO LOSE OUR COUNTRY!

           If union agitators succeed in bullying governors
           like Scott Walker and impose their statist agenda
           at any price, we will lose our country.

           If liberal statists in the Senate impose their
           will on this Congress and continue runaway
           spending, we will lose our country!

Dear Family Members and Friends:

Is this completely insane and out of control or what?

Have a great week.

Dave U.

Defense of Marriage and a response from Orrin Hatch

Here is the response from our excellent senator, Orrin Hatch, from our letter to him in regards to

the Defense of Marriage Act:

Subject: Correspondence from Senator Orrin Hatch
Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2011 11:59:46 -0500



March 7, 2011



Mr. David Udall
46 South 1025 East
Lindon, Utah 84042

Dear Mr. Udall:

Thank you for your letter supporting the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA). It is good to hear from you.

In 1996, Congress overwhelming enacted the Defense of Marriage Act (P.L. 104-199). Under this law, a same-sex relationship considered a marriage in one state does not need to be treated as a marriage in another state. I strongly support this law as it preserves states’ rights to recognize same-sex marriage without imposing the will of other states. Specifically, Utah should not be subject to another state’s definition of marriage.

Advocates of same-sex marriage are challenging the constitutionality of the federal Defense of Marriage Act. As you know, President Barack Obama recently indicated that the Department of Justice will no longer defend in court the Defense of Marriage Act. I believe the President is wrong in this decision.

The Department of Justice has a duty to defend the constitutionality of any statute passed by Congress with reasonable argument, no matter the subject matter. A reasonable constitutional argument has been made for the Defense of Marriage Act, so it is a dereliction of duty for the Department of Justice not to defend this law. I will continue to urge the President and the Department of Justice to uphold their responsibility.

Again, thank you for your writing. I value your input.

Your Senator,




Orrin G. Hatch
United States Senator


OGH:app

Why Create a Conservative Cause blog?

March 5th, 2011:

Why did I create this blog entitled the: Conservative Cause?

I have formulated so many political opinions my entire life that it was high time that I created a blog to support the social and the fiscal conservative causes in the USA and the world. I started out at the young age of nine years old watching the Kennedy-Nixon debates in 1960. I was hooked, and I have been tracking politics ever since.

My father, E. Earl Udall, was a city manager and politically conservative, especially fiscally conservative. I do not believe that the cities he managed ever raised municipal taxes under his watch. My grand father, John H. Udall, was one of the early conservative Republican mayors of Phoenix, AZ. My Uncle Nicholas Udall was also the mayor of Phoenix in the 1950's. Nick Udall helped write the constitution for the city of Phoenix.

We also have other noted family members who are on the liberal side of the political spectrum who are quite renowned, both today and in years past. I am from the conservative side of the family and I am proud of it.

Every day I see things in the news about Obama and his cronies, liberal friends, and allies that bother me a lot. Just the other day I saw that Obama ordered the DOJ, Department of Justice, to stop defending DOMA, the Defense of Marriage Act, in court. This Act was signed into law by Bill Clinton in 1996.

Here is my email/letter to my congressman of which I also copied to my national Utah Senators, Senator Mike Lee and Senator Orrin Hatch:
“Dear Congressman Chaffetz,

We are outraged at the Obama administration's plan to not defend the DOMA Defense of Marriage Act, signed into law in 1996 by Pres. Bill Clinton. Obama has decided to abdicate his responsibility to uphold this law. As Newt G. said of recent, in so many words, that Obama is striking down a federal law all on his own- against the congress's wishes which is unconstitutional, since he has sworn under oath to uphold the federal laws. So as a conservative Republican, what is your plan to defend DOMA?

Note: This abdication by Obama has the far reaching effects to perhaps cause churches who oppose homosexual marriages to either get in line with gay marriages or go under as churches and shut down as a church. This abdication by Obama could eventually imperil freedom of religion in the USA since the federal government is now so involved with marriage in the USA, and gays will no doubt put pressure on churches to grant them a legal civil marriage. What do you think and what are your plans to head off Obama and the Justice Dept. and the gay community if in fact, you agree with me?

Sincerely,

Dave Udall and Laurel Udall”

Note to the reader: This is the beginning of my thoughts, opinions and political commentaries on this blog. I hope that I can persuade a few people here and there to the conservative side and I hope to inspire and strengthen my fellow conservatives in their own worthy resolutions to get our country back on a solid foundation on both the fiscal and social issues of our day.

You will find me always supporting the Constitution of the United States, and those conservative citizens who are fighting to uphold it across this great nation. And like Justice Scalia of the Supreme Court said in so many words: The constitution is not an evolving document, to be construed beyond the original intent of its creators, the founding fathers that attended and put input into the US constitution at the original convention. While many liberals today think that the Constitution is a living document that can be loosely interpreted and that many things with in it are out dated and should be discarded.

I also do not, nor will I ever support the ever growing concentration of power to the federal government and to Washington, DC, as many liberals, such as Harry Reid, former speaker Pelosi and Obama want to have happen.

You will also never find me supporting any form of socialism nor any form of communism nor any form of tyrannical rule through out the USA or world. You will instead always find me in support of the conservative cause for freedom, free enterprise, free speech, positive humanitarian efforts, family values and the private ownership of property.

*** Please note: I welcome and thank you for reading this blog and invite your comments.